Legalizing Marijuana Why Citizens Should Just Say No. The scientific literature is clear that marijuana is addictive and that its use significantly impairs bodily and mental functions. Marijuana use is associated with memory loss, cancer, immune system deficiencies, heart disease, and birth defects, among other conditions. Even where decriminalized, marijuana trafficking remains a source of violence, crime, and social disintegration. Nonetheless, this November, California voters will consider a ballot initiative, the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2. RCTCA,2 that would legalize most marijuana distribution and use under state law. These activities would remain federal crimes. This vote is the culmination of an organized campaign by pro marijuana activists stretching back decades. The current campaign, like previous efforts, downplays the well documented harms of marijuana trafficking and use while promising benefits ranging from reduced crime to additional tax revenue. In particular, supporters of the initiative make five bold claims Marijuana is safe and non addictive. Marijuana prohibition makes no more sense than alcohol prohibition did in the early 1. The governments efforts to combat illegal drugs have been a total failure. The money spent on government efforts to combat the illegal drug trade can be better spent on substance abuse and treatment for the allegedly few marijuana users who abuse the drug. Tax revenue collected from marijuana sales would substantially outweigh the social costs of legalization. As this paper details, all five claims are demonstrably false or, based on the best evidence, highly dubious. Further, supporters of the initiative simply ignore the mechanics of decriminalizationthat is, how it would directly affect law enforcement, crime, and communities. Arguments Against The New Deal Programs QuizletAmong the important questions left unanswered are How would the state law fit into a federal regime that prohibits marijuana production, distribution, and possession Would decriminalization, especially if combined with taxation, expand market opportunities for the gangs and cartels that currently dominate drug distribution Would existing zoning laws prohibit marijuana cultivation in residential neighborhoods, and if not, what measures would growers have to undertake to keep children from the plants Would transportation providers be prohibited from firing bus drivers because they smoke marijuana No one knows the specifics of how marijuana decriminalization would work in practice or what measures would be necessary to prevent children, teenagers, criminals, and addicts from obtaining the drug. The federal government shares these concerns. Arguments Against The New Deal Programs' title='Arguments Against The New Deal Programs' />The role of The New Deal in the history of the United States of America. Three new allegations of sexual or physical assault have been made against Harvey Weinstein, according to a new report. The Washington Post reported the previously. There were many people and groups who opposed the Franklin Delano Roosevelts New Deal. Huey Long, an early supporter of FDR, turned against him and the New Deal. Breaking news, weather, analysis and information from the Omaha WorldHerald about Omaha events, local weather, sports, schools, crime, government, health and. OE4000000813-OE.jpg' alt='Arguments Against The New Deal Programs During The Great' title='Arguments Against The New Deal Programs During The Great' />Gil Kerlikowske, Director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy ONDCP, recently stated, Marijuana legalization, for any purpose, is a non starter in the Obama Administration. The Administrationwidely viewed as more liberal than any other in recent memory and, for a time, as embodying the hopes of pro legalization activists5has weighed the costs and benefits and concluded that marijuana legalization would compromise public health and safety. Californias voters, if they take a fair minded look at the evidence and the practical problems of legalization, should reach the same conclusion Marijuana is a dangerous substance that should remain illegal under state law. The Initiative. The RCTCAs purpose, as defined by advocates of legalization, is to regulate marijuana just as the government regulates alcohol. The law would allow anyone 2. Arguments Against The New Deal Programs Chart' title='Arguments Against The New Deal Programs Chart' />The New Deal was a series of federal programs, public work projects, and financial reforms and regulations, enacted in the United States during the 1930s in response. Individuals could possess an unlimited number of living and harvested marijuana plants on the premises where they were grown. Individual landowners or lawful occupants of private property could cultivate marijuana plants for personal consumption in an area of not more than 2. The RCTCA would legalize drug related paraphernalia and tools and would license establishments for on site smoking and other consumption of marijuana. Supporters have included some alcohol like restrictions against, for example, smoking marijuana while operating a vehicle. Finally, the act authorizes the imposition and collection of taxes and fees associated with legalization of marijuana. Unsafe in Any Amount How Marijuana Is Not Like Alcohol. Marijuana advocates have had some success peddling the notion that marijuana is a soft drug, similar to alcohol, and fundamentally different from hard drugs like cocaine or heroin. It is true that marijuana is not the most dangerous of the commonly abused drugs, but that is not to say that it is safe. Indeed, marijuana shares more in common with the hard drugs than it does with alcohol. A common argument for legalization is that smoking marijuana is no more dangerous than drinking alcohol and that prohibiting the use of marijuana is therefore no more justified than the prohibition of alcohol. As Jacob Sullum, author of Saying Yes In Defense of Drug Use, writes Americans understood the problems associated with alcohol abuse, but they also understood the problems associated with Prohibition, which included violence, organized crime, official corruption, the erosion of civil liberties, disrespect for the law, and injuries and deaths caused by tainted black market booze. They decided that these unintended side effects far outweighed whatever harms Prohibition prevented by discouraging drinking. Ultimate Ghosts And Goblins Psp Iso Torrent. Arguments Against The New Deal Programs Successfulness' title='Arguments Against The New Deal Programs Successfulness' />The same sort of analysis today would show that the harm caused by drug prohibition far outweighs the harm it prevents, even without taking into account the value to each individual of being sovereign over his own body and mind. At first blush, this argument is appealing, especially to those wary of over regulation by government. But it overlooks the enormous difference between alcohol and marijuana. Legalization advocates claim that marijuana and alcohol are mild intoxicants and so should be regulated similarly but as the experience of nearly every culture, over the thousands of years of human history, demonstrates, alcohol is different. Nearly every culture has its own alcoholic preparations, and nearly all have successfully regulated alcohol consumption through cultural norms. The same cannot be said of marijuana. There are several possible explanations for alcohols unique status For most people, it is not addictive it is rarely consumed to the point of intoxication low level consumption is consistent with most manual and intellectual tasks it has several positive health benefits and it is formed by the fermentation of many common substances and easily metabolized by the body. To be sure, there are costs associated with alcohol abuse, such as drunk driving and disease associated with excessive consumption. A few culturesand this nation for a short while during Prohibitionhave concluded that the benefits of alcohol consumption are not worth the costs. But they are the exception most cultures have concluded that it is acceptable in moderation. No other intoxicant shares that status. Alcohol differs from marijuana in several crucial respects. First, marijuana is far more likely to cause addiction. Second, it is usually consumed to the point of intoxication. Third, it has no known general healthful properties, though it may have some palliative effects. Fourth, it is toxic and deleterious to health.